Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tibia Game
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Redirect (non-admin closure), There are no arguments for keeping this duplicate subject article and it seems that all of the important information exists in the more established counterpart. Torchwood Who? (talk) 15:18, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Tibia Game (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Game is already featured under Tibia (computer game). Cant really find a catagory for speedy, so here it goes. Queerbubbles | Leave me Some Love 14:22, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete While this isn't a case of duplicate content per se it is a case of two articles on the same exact subject. After reading the article's talk page it is clear that this article's primary editor feels very strongly about the validity of the information in this article. I'm going to urge that editor to help the project by expanding the Tibia (computer game) article. --Torchwood Who? (talk) 15:02, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge any mergeable info into Tibia (computer game) and then redirect it there. --Pixelface (talk) 16:11, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game deletions. Pixelface (talk) 16:12, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, nothing worth salvaging. Optionally redirect to Tibia (computer game), but doesn't add any new search terms so isn't really worth it. --Dhartung | Talk 18:26, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Redirect, redirects are cheap and this article's existence is proof someone tried to search for it as such. Nifboy (talk) 20:26, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect - I concur 100% with Nifboy. The fact that the article exists indicates that it is a valid search term -- Whpq (talk) 13:30, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Anything stopping me from creating the redirect now? Because it would honestly be 5 seconds of my time. Queerbubbles | Leave me Some Love 14:17, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.